Jump to content

Talk:Perspiration

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perspiration

[edit]

Perspiration is the process. It is equal with sweating. It's not a fluid as the article suggests. Aminabzz (talk) 21:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 September 2024

[edit]

PerspirationSweatWP:COMMONNAME, in line with sweat gland and night sweatsTobias (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 08:01, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tobiasi0 I still think this needs further discussion as it relates to WP:MEDTITLE. Feel free to open a discussion by clicking the "discuss" link in your request above, and make sure to notify Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
15:25, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Medicine has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 08:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the note at WT:MED. I somewhat prefer the current name, as I think it has a more formal, encyclopedic tone. Also, it's not clear to me whether this article ought to be about "the fluid" or about "the process of excreting the fluid". "Perspiration" works for both, but with the proposed name, it would have to be either sweat (the wet stuff itself, as a collection of water and some other chemicals) or sweating (the process of making the wet stuff; Diaphoresis). As this article currently covers both (and that seems fine to me), then having a name that covers both in the same grammatical form seems convenient. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that choosing a name solely based on its formal phonetic qualities to sound fancy to a layperson is neither purposeful nor encyclopedic. We have other guidelines like WP:COMMONNAME or WP:MEDTITLE, which lead to titles like 'sleepwalking' instead of 'somnambulism', 'fever' instead of 'pyrexia', and, in this context, 'sweat gland' instead of 'sudoriparous gland'. Additionally, 'sweat' makes the topic more accessable, as it's used in both everyday language and medical terminology, thus satisfying both of the previously mentioned guidelines.
Furthermore, we're not dealing with purely colloquial expression like 'poop' to refer to feces or 'tummy' for abdomen. 'Sweat' is a term that's also used in scientific contexts, as I mentioned earlier, and it's by far the most commonly used term for this subject.
As for the core topic of the article, it may need rewriting anyway, as the process of diaphoresis and the fluid 'sweat' are mixed somewhat randomly throughout the text. It would be much clearer to differentiate between the fluid and the process, rather than avoiding the issue by using a term that is imprecise for both. In this case, 'perspiration' is actually quite vague. I believe focusing on the fluid itself would be more effective, as the process of sweating depends on the fluid, much like we need saliva to start the process of salivation or tears for lacrimation, and not the other way around. –Tobias (talk) 13:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]